Bulls Banter
« Mr Jamie Pitman »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 18, 2013, 1:23pm

[Home] [New Topics] [Help] [Search] [Calendar] [Login] [Register]


Independent Bulls Forum

Bulls Banter :: The Bulls :: Main Forum :: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Page 3 of 5 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]
AuthorTopic: Mr Jamie Pitman (Read 2,398 times)
leicesterbull
Senior Member
****
member is offline





Joined: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 290
Karma: -8
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #30 on Mar 1, 2012, 10:17pm »
There has been more common sense in this thread than in most of the others in the past year combined. For those that do go on Saturday, please give my share of support for the team as well - and I have got something of a foghorn for a voice! With three children all involved in activities at the weekend, my attendance at matches is sporadic at best(4 so far this season) but I kick every ball metaphorically on Saturday afternoons. I will hopefully be at the Southend and Rotherham games this month to make up for those matches I have missed. We do need to stay UNITED - this talk of boycotts isn't helping us at all(refer to my previous post entitled "A couple of things" for a prime example). If our three geographically-closest rivals in this League being promoted is the price that needs to paid to ensure our survival, then so be it. So, let's focus on supporting OUR team - Slop-baiting can wait as far as I am concerned. COYB!!!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
ExLandlord
God
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

This could take five years to put right.



Joined: Mar 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,989
Location: In Limbo
Karma: -640
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #31 on Mar 1, 2012, 10:29pm »
No REAL supporter would criticise a fan who lives miles away for not attending....it's the buggers who live on the doorstep and don't go that pi55 me off.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
The older you get, the more important it is to not act your age.

There's 10 types of people - those that understand binary and those that don't.

Parka – diagonally parked in a parallel universe. FACT
Tupsleybull
God
*****
member is offline



BUS 17 Survivor



Joined: Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,488
Location: tupsley
Karma: -62
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #32 on Mar 1, 2012, 10:38pm »
In a strange way Tuesday has made me realise how much passion us fans have. We all want the same thing and we all voice our opinion in different ways. But we are all HEREFORD TILL WE DIE!!!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Born a Hereford Fan, still a Hereford fan and will die a Hereford fan!
fishlock4ever
God
*****
member is offline





Joined: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,658
Karma: -200
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #33 on Mar 1, 2012, 11:18pm »
Some good comments here.

I'd love to know what JP has had a say in, in recent months.

- did he want fleets to leave?
- Did he want Hoult as Assistant manager?
- did he want Peters
- has he made the new signings and new contracts?

I honestly feel Peters has f u c k e d this club up a hell of a lot more than he's getting credit for.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
brightspark
Full Member
***
member is offline





Joined: Jul 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 141
Karma: -4
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #34 on Mar 2, 2012, 6:15am »
Regardless of what has happened since Peters arrival, JP had earnt himself the sack prior to it. Which is why he went snivelling to the board saying he needed ANOTHER mentor 'cause when negotiating his new contract and he told them he could manage he fibbed. So albeit he didnt name Peters but yes he did ask for a DOF...to save his own skin.....AGAIN.
Its always all about him isnt it? and to hell with what happens to OUR club. Because of him, him needing a job and him holding HUFC to ransom hes gonna send the club he apparantly loves to football oblivion. How such a crap rookie manager can have such a hold over a club continues to baffle me. SAF runs Utd as Cloughie ran Forest but PITMAN running Hereford?! Just dont get it.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
/\<>()7
God
*****
member is offline





Joined: Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,390
Karma: -355
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #35 on Mar 2, 2012, 7:37am »

Mar 1, 2012, 11:18pm, fishlock4ever wrote:
Some good comments here.

I'd love to know what JP has had a say in, in recent months.

- did he want fleets to leave?
- Did he want Hoult as Assistant manager?
- did he want Peters
- has he made the new signings and new contracts?

I honestly feel Peters has f u c k e d this club up a hell of a lot more than he's getting credit for.

Yes
Yes
No
No
hope this helps fishcake
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
rhymenocerous
Guest
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #36 on Mar 2, 2012, 9:23am »

Mar 1, 2012, 11:18pm, fishlock4ever wrote:
Some good comments here.

I'd love to know what JP has had a say in, in recent months.

- did he want fleets to leave?
- Did he want Hoult as Assistant manager?
- did he want Peters
- has he made the new signings and new contracts?

I honestly feel Peters has f u c k e d this club up a hell of a lot more than he's getting credit for.


But most of those things you noted happened without Peters?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
sidvicious
Guest
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #37 on Mar 2, 2012, 9:25am »
Yes Fleets is "difficult" to manage.
Yes
Actually i think he has always accepted having someone else with experience around is good for all concerned.
Two answers here, Yes re recent signings post Davey, and no re contracts for those signings, I think DK much closer to it now after the Davey debacle.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
corve
God
*****
member is offline





Joined: Sept 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,684
Location: Ludlow Central
Karma: -80
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #38 on Mar 2, 2012, 12:27pm »
I honestly feel Peters has f u c k e d this club up a hell of a lot more than he's getting credit for.

So wide of the mark it would be laughable if our position wasn't so awful.

The only time we WERE picking up points was when Peters was involved. Pitman has effectively been in sole control for the last mont yielding a total of three points from 7 games. He's so out of his depth its embarassing.

IMHO given a free hand Peters could keep us up. Not pretty to watch but beggars can't be choosers and as Slop fans know he can sure motivate a team and organise a defence which is what we need more then anything at the moment. Pitman is incapable of motivating anybody as the last month shows.

But for whatever reason this dosnt fit the agenda of several on here, so we'll blunder on until its too late...
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Kyuss Lives
fishlock4ever
God
*****
member is offline





Joined: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,658
Karma: -200
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #39 on Mar 2, 2012, 12:34pm »

Mar 2, 2012, 12:27pm, corve wrote:
I honestly feel Peters has f u c k e d this club up a hell of a lot more than he's getting credit for.

So wide of the mark it would be laughable if our position wasn't so awful.

The only time we WERE picking up points was when Peters was involved. Pitman has effectively been in sole control for the last mont yielding a total of three points from 7 games. He's so out of his depth its embarassing.

IMHO given a free hand Peters could keep us up. Not pretty to watch but beggars can't be choosers and as Slop fans know he can sure motivate a team and organise a defence which is what we need more then anything at the moment. Pitman is incapable of motivating anybody as the last month shows.

But for whatever reason this dosnt fit the agenda of several on here, so we'll blunder on until its too late...


this is laughable.

Are you suggesting that Peters was involved for every good game but not every bad game?

On what basis do you know that Peters has been involved in the good games but not the bad ones.

Typical idiot comment from an idiotic poster. You're like Ex, make a couple of polar oppisite predictions at the start of the season and then stick the opinion that suits best!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
dirtydog
Guest
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #40 on Mar 2, 2012, 12:44pm »
As one of Pitman's fiercest critics, I find this late attempt at a "we love you Jamie really" thread pretty embarrassing.

I have nothing against Pitman as a person, it's his refusal to accept that he is way out of his depth and that by continuing to sponge off the club instead of resigning he is effectively acting as a Parasite.

I agree with Corve - Petersball may be awful to watch but when Gary first took over, we won 3 out of 4 and also got a creditable point at Swindon.

It's obvious to everyone that over the last few games, Gary has been told not to get involved so that shocking run of 3 points out of 21 is solely Pitman's fault.

If Pitman and his cronies leave and Peters is put in sole charge, we at least have a fighting chance of survival. With Pitman we have none.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
ExLandlord
God
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

This could take five years to put right.



Joined: Mar 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,989
Location: In Limbo
Karma: -640
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #41 on Mar 2, 2012, 12:44pm »

Mar 2, 2012, 12:27pm, corve wrote:
I honestly feel Peters has f u c k e d this club up a hell of a lot more than he's getting credit for.

So wide of the mark it would be laughable if our position wasn't so awful.

The only time we WERE picking up points was when Peters was involved. Pitman has effectively been in sole control for the last mont yielding a total of three points from 7 games. He's so out of his depth its embarassing.

IMHO given a free hand Peters could keep us up. Not pretty to watch but beggars can't be choosers and as Slop fans know he can sure motivate a team and organise a defence which is what we need more then anything at the moment. Pitman is incapable of motivating anybody as the last month shows.

But for whatever reason this dosnt fit the agenda of several on here, so we'll blunder on until its too late...


Not really disagreeing with you 'cos, TBH, I ain't got much faith in either of the buggers.

Meanwhile, I give you ...
Crawley (H)
Yeovil (H) (Cup)
Burton (H)
Crewe (A)
Rotherham (H)
Plymouth (A)
Port Vale (H)
Accy (H)

7 League games 3 points when Martin was, supposedly, running the show.

Anyone's guess.
« Last Edit: Mar 2, 2012, 12:56pm by ExLandlord »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
The older you get, the more important it is to not act your age.

There's 10 types of people - those that understand binary and those that don't.

Parka – diagonally parked in a parallel universe. FACT
fishlock4ever
God
*****
member is offline





Joined: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,658
Karma: -200
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #42 on Mar 2, 2012, 12:52pm »

Mar 2, 2012, 12:44pm, dirtydog wrote:
As one of Pitman's fiercest critics, I find this late attempt at a "we love you Jamie really" thread pretty embarrassing.

I have nothing against Pitman as a person, it's his refusal to accept that he is way out of his depth and that by continuing to sponge off the club instead of resigning he is effectively acting as a Parasite.

I agree with Corve - Petersball may be awful to watch but when Gary first took over, we won 3 out of 4 and also got a creditable point at Swindon.

It's obvious to everyone that over the last few games, Gary has been told not to get involved so that shocking run of 3 points out of 21 is solely Pitman's fault.

If Pitman and his cronies leave and Peters is put in sole charge, we at least have a fighting chance of survival. With Pitman we have none.


it's not a love in at all. We all want him to leave. But for people like you to call him a parasite it's insulting, classless and not how fans should behave. Especially for a man that has been associated with this club for so many years.

Of course I appreciate you are probably a WUM.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
ExLandlord
God
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

This could take five years to put right.



Joined: Mar 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,989
Location: In Limbo
Karma: -640
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #43 on Mar 2, 2012, 12:55pm »
it's insulting, classless and not how fans should behave

..yet it's perfectly correct for you to do it to The Chairman?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
The older you get, the more important it is to not act your age.

There's 10 types of people - those that understand binary and those that don't.

Parka – diagonally parked in a parallel universe. FACT
nailswortholdbull
God
*****
member is offline



Living near a town populated, entirely, by FGR strikers........



Joined: Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,637
Location: Nailsworth
Karma: -46
Re: Mr Jamie Pitman
« Reply #44 on Mar 2, 2012, 12:56pm »
Just an addon to the abuse comments.
I said earlier that JP, for all his faults, doesn't deserve the abuse he gets on here, but I have always felt that he's never given less than 100% fpr the club.
Contrast that with Sean Canham, who has done very little for the Club, is (probably) on a wage packet larger than Jamie's, who hasn't had to work too hard for that money, and, currently, is making no contribution WHATSOEVER to our wellbeing, and then tell me..........Do you still believe that JP is the villain of the piece?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
If I have failed to offend you with my comments, stick around. Your time will come...............
« Page 3 of 5 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile