Bulls Banter - Ex- serious question

fishlock4ever
God

member is offline

Joined: Nov 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 7,658
Karma: -200

Re: Ex- serious question
« Reply #15 on Mar 26, 2012, 1:45pm »

ex's are always more factual.....but that's only because he gives several options which mean one of them will be right.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

jonny
Guest

Re: Ex- serious question
« Reply #16 on Mar 26, 2012, 1:47pm »

Here we go again - could this be confined to this thread this time please?

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Jamer99
God

member is offline

Remember Who You Are.

Joined: Nov 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 7,117
Karma: -275

Re: Ex- serious question
« Reply #17 on Mar 26, 2012, 3:24pm »

Another boring thread from the forums Mr Tedious-and-boring.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Remember Who You Are.

/\<>()7
God

member is offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 18,398
Karma: -355

Re: Ex- serious question
« Reply #18 on Mar 26, 2012, 4:03pm »

i WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT FISHY OR A MEMBER OF HIS FAMILY DOSN'T LIKE ABOUT MR KITE?

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

enforcerbull
God

member is offline

[avatar]

ee by gum 6th place

Joined: May 2010
Gender: Male

Posts: 5,154
Location: bill wiggins duck pond
Karma: 30

Re: Ex- serious question
« Reply #19 on Mar 26, 2012, 4:18pm »

Mar 26, 2012, 4:03pm, /\<>()7 wrote:

i WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT FISHY OR A MEMBER OF HIS FAMILY DOSN'T LIKE ABOUT MR KITE?

I don't think he knows himself

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Politicians and nappies have one thing in common,
They should both be changed regularly and for the same reason

/\<>()7
God

member is offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 18,398
Karma: -355

Re: Ex- serious question
« Reply #20 on Mar 26, 2012, 5:20pm »

I think he does as i have been told by a reliable sauce there are past isuies

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

wx
God

member is offline

[avatar]

Joined: Mar 2011
Gender: Male

Posts: 11,100
Karma: -270

Re: Ex- serious question
« Reply #21 on Mar 26, 2012, 5:35pm »

Bit personal too put on a public forum. Drop it!

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

enforcerbull
God

member is offline

[avatar]

ee by gum 6th place

Joined: May 2010
Gender: Male

Posts: 5,154
Location: bill wiggins duck pond
Karma: 30

Re: Ex- serious question
« Reply #22 on Mar 26, 2012, 6:08pm »

He needs to make a phone call first

He wouldn't know what to say until he does

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Politicians and nappies have one thing in common,
They should both be changed regularly and for the same reason

fishlock4ever
God

member is offline

Joined: Nov 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 7,658
Karma: -200

Re: Ex- serious question
« Reply #23 on Mar 26, 2012, 6:13pm »

Your reliable source is wrong I am afraid. Never had any dealings with the man- I simply acknowledged the impact losing GT might have.

Look, the facts are quite simple; running a football club is not easy. DK has made too many wrong turns and as a consequence we find ourselves in a right mess. I have never said he isnt a decent bloke or that is heart isnt in the right place.

We all know GT wasnt perfect. Arguably his knowledge of the game is what saw him through- he certainly didnt make 8 consecutive profits from growing the buisness did he. Of course his money was made with Manset, Mahon, Williams, Parry, Pugh etc etc. He knew about agents fees, he knew the ins and out of lower league football and how to make it pay.

The crucial point that many will quietly admit to themsleves but not on here however is that what GT did here was totally taken for granted. These people simply didnt spare a thought for what might happen or what could have happened once we lost such an important part of the club.

Was GT perfect- no chance. Would I go back in time, forfeit everything good that has happened and have him as the owner of the club...Yes I would.

You dont have to share my opinion, you just need to realise that my view is no less valid than yours.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

ROK123
Full Member

member is offline

Joined: Dec 2010
Gender: Male

Posts: 182
Karma: -26

Re: Ex- serious question
« Reply #24 on Mar 26, 2012, 6:18pm »

Mar 26, 2012, 6:13pm, fishlock4ever wrote:

Your reliable source is wrong I am afraid. Never had any dealings with the man- I simply acknowledged the impact losing GT might have.

Look, the facts are quite simple; running a football club is not easy. DK has made too many wrong turns and as a consequence we find ourselves in a right mess. I have never said he isnt a decent bloke or that is heart isnt in the right place.

We all know GT wasnt perfect. Arguably his knowledge of the game is what saw him through- he certainly didnt make 8 consecutive profits from growing the buisness did he. Of course his money was made with Manset, Mahon, Williams, Parry, Pugh etc etc. He knew about agents fees, he knew the ins and out of lower league football and how to make it pay.

The crucial point that many will quietly admit to themsleves but not on here however is that what GT did here was totally taken for granted. These people simply didnt spare a thought for what might happen or what could have happened once we lost such an important part of the club.

Was GT perfect- no chance. Would I go back in time, forfeit everything good that has happened and have him as the owner of the club...Yes I would.

You dont have to share my opinion, you just need to realise that my view is no less valid than yours.

Sounds a good summary of the situation for me.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Gresty Road
God

member is offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,104
Location: Here and There.
Karma: -33

Re: Ex- serious question
« Reply #25 on Mar 26, 2012, 6:20pm »

Mar 26, 2012, 6:13pm, fishlock4ever wrote:

Your reliable source is wrong I am afraid. Never had any dealings with the man- I simply acknowledged the impact losing GT might have.

Look, the facts are quite simple; running a football club is not easy. DK has made too many wrong turns and as a consequence we find ourselves in a right mess. I have never said he isnt a decent bloke or that is heart isnt in the right place.

We all know GT wasnt perfect. Arguably his knowledge of the game is what saw him through- he certainly didnt make 8 consecutive profits from growing the buisness did he. Of course his money was made with Manset, Mahon, Williams, Parry, Pugh etc etc. He knew about agents fees, he knew the ins and out of lower league football and how to make it pay.

The crucial point that many will quietly admit to themsleves but not on here however is that what GT did here was totally taken for granted. These people simply didnt spare a thought for what might happen or what could have happened once we lost such an important part of the club.

Was GT perfect- no chance. Would I go back in time, forfeit everything good that has happened and have him as the owner of the club...Yes I would.

You dont have to share my opinion, you just need to realise that my view is no less valid than yours.

Quite possibly for the first time (but not necessarily) I actually think that is a very sensible post.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

glosbull
Guest

Re: Ex- serious question
« Reply #26 on Mar 26, 2012, 6:23pm »

Mar 26, 2012, 6:13pm, fishlock4ever wrote:

Your reliable source is wrong I am afraid. Never had any dealings with the man- I simply acknowledged the impact losing GT might have.

Look, the facts are quite simple; running a football club is not easy. DK has made too many wrong turns and as a consequence we find ourselves in a right mess. I have never said he isnt a decent bloke or that is heart isnt in the right place.

We all know GT wasnt perfect. Arguably his knowledge of the game is what saw him through- he certainly didnt make 8 consecutive profits from growing the buisness did he. Of course his money was made with Manset, Mahon, Williams, Parry, Pugh etc etc. He knew about agents fees, he knew the ins and out of lower league football and how to make it pay.

The crucial point that many will quietly admit to themsleves but not on here however is that what GT did here was totally taken for granted. These people simply didnt spare a thought for what might happen or what could have happened once we lost such an important part of the club.

Was GT perfect- no chance. Would I go back in time, forfeit everything good that has happened and have him as the owner of the club...Yes I would.

You dont have to share my opinion, you just need to realise that my view is no less valid than yours.